User talk:76.8.254.3

March 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Universal Camouflage Pattern. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:22, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Sandy Stimpson + Talk Page
Hello, I'm Marx01. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sandy Stimpson have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please never remove text from a talk page, or well-cited information from an article without clear, stated reason.
 * Stop hand nuvola.svg You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sandy Stimpson.  --  Marx01  Tell me about it 19:23, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sandy Simpson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bmf 051 (talk) 13:06, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Bmf 051. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Sandy Simpson seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bmf 051 (talk) 13:06, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Sandy Stimpson shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Please refrain from repeatingly reverting changes. Discuss your issue on the talk page and try to get consensus for your proposed edit.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sandy Stimpson.   Pyrite Pro  (talk) 21:38, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring, as done at Sandy Stimpson. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Nick Moyes (talk) 00:16, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.