User talk:76.81.101.114

October 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of military engagements of World War I, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.   The Tips of Apmh (talk) 20:52, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sugar plantations in Hawaii have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:47, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sugar plantations in Hawaii was changed by 76.81.101.114 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.882682 on 2022-01-25T19:47:23+00:00

August 2022
Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Sanford B. Dole—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Wikipelli Talk  21:03, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mississippi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nythar T . C 23:31, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mississippi, you may be blocked from editing. Zinnober9 (talk) 23:32, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kamehameha I. >>> Ingenuity . talk ; 23:29, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. --   LuK3      (Talk)   23:47, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

September 2023
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Maui has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Joyous! Noise! 23:24, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Maui, you may be blocked from editing. Joyous! Noise! 23:36, 1 September 2023 (UTC)


 * I did no such thing ;) 76.81.101.114 (talk) 23:38, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Maui. Bahooka (talk) 23:59, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Asa Flint Chong(Walsh)


Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Asa Flint Chong(Walsh), is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CMacMillan (talk) 23:40, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

April 2024
Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Mass surveillance—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Wikipelli Talk  23:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)