User talk:76.82.42.150

September 2021
Hello, I'm 0Michael105. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Producers (1967 film) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   &mdash; 0Michael105  (talk · contribs) 06:30, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Matthew Perry, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 03:10, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at George P. Wilbur, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.   The Tips of Apmh (talk) 00:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Haruo Nakajima. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. ''Do not vandalize articles. It is disruptive per WP:DE.'' Armegon (talk) 19:42, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but your repeated edits of the Frankenstein's monster page are... bad. If you would just read the page before you edit it, you'd see that it states "the creature soon enough became best known in the popular imagination as 'Frankenstein'. This usage is sometimes considered erroneous, but some usage commentators regard the monster sense of 'Frankenstein' as well-established and not an error." It's an issue of debate, and you cannot try to objectively state it's wrong in the lead section. Keep your personal opinion out of it as I am trying to do. Willhohenstein (talk) 06:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC).

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Frankenstein's monster, you may be blocked from editing. Mad Loux (talk) 22:32, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

November 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Frankenstein's monster. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  always forever  (talk)  19:22, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Blocked 72 hours; next block will be longer
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:36, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 22:56, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.