User talk:76.95.133.51

September 2022
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kleinpecan (talk) 01:34, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kh-22, you may be blocked from editing. Liliana (UwU / nya) 02:36, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kh-22. Liliana (UwU / nya) 02:42, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kh-22, you may be blocked from editing. Beauty School Dropout (talk) 02:49, 13 September 2022 (UTC)  You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 02:53, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Hello, I am trying to learn how to edit correctly here on wiki (my first time ever). I originally made some serious errors in how I read and attempted to edit the article, but I'm now trying to make a statement with a reliable source. Why do you keep erasing my statement and accuse me of vandalizing wiki? I sincerely hope you are not making moderation decisions based upon bias. 76.95.133.51 (talk) 02:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Your additions were removed because you did not provide a reliable source for them (see Referencing for beginners). Kleinpecan (talk) 03:07, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, I'm trying to learn how to edit correctly here on wiki (very first time). I am a $$$ supporter of wiki and was trying to make an honest attempt at a relevant statement regarding the article. I may have misread a part that was actually a real quote at first and tried to correct my mistake, but some person kept erasing what I wrote and accused me of vandalizing the article. And now you ban me??? I sincerely hope you or the other person are not doing this out of genuine bias. I gave a relevant article from a reliable source. What gives? Is this all just an innocent mistake by people far more adept at this than noob me? 76.95.133.51 (talk) 03:07, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello, but I finally learned how to cite from a reliable source. I gave the source, why is my statement still being erased? 76.95.133.51 (talk) 03:09, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * By the way, I am NOT vandalizing anything here. That seems very offensive. 76.95.133.51 (talk) 03:11, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The Amnesty International article ("Ukrainian fighting tactics endanger civilians") that you cited does not say anything about the Serhiivka building strike. And in fact, your addition contradicts another Amnesty report: "Amnesty International visited the strike locations in Serhiivka and found no evidence on the presence of Ukrainian soldiers, weapons, or other valid military targets nearby. Satellite imagery reviewed by Amnesty International also did not indicate any military activity in the area." ("Civilians killed by 'reckless' Russian attacks on Serhiivka apartment block and beach resort") Kleinpecan (talk) 03:14, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply, I guess I was wrong about everything. Good luck with the "efforts", hope it all ends up well, lol. 76.95.133.51 (talk) 03:47, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * But it is definitely interesting to see just how "authoritarian" the wiki infrastructure is. Human nature, I guess.... 76.95.133.51 (talk) 03:49, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * But to pay for this pleasure is definitely another matter I certainly do have full control over :-) 76.95.133.51 (talk) 03:51, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Btw Kleinpecan, there are official things some people could tell you that would make your mouth drop, dark shadowy things you will never hear admitted to in broad daylight. No credible publicly written sources you would ever find or be able to quote, but make no mistake, they certainly DO exist and have serious impact upon global things, even if not easily quotable. Sometimes merely preventing impact, for the better of the populace by default. Please do understand that most will not be able to see the forest for the trees, by design. Have a modicum of respect for what some say, and don't just blindly reason it all away because you "think" it so based upon what you are able to easily forage together in print. A word to the wise, if you want to take it to task. 76.95.133.51 (talk) 04:13, 13 September 2022 (UTC)