User talk:77.101.6.102

December 2016
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Scottish independence, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 01:16, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2017
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Scottish independence, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Drchriswilliams (talk) 01:33, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I noticed that in this edit to Earl's Court, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:19, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Rathlin Island— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rathlin Island, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Home Lander (talk) 21:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Page 5 of the tables give the relevant figures. 47% yes, 46% no. Or, to be more precise, 410/873 = 46.96% and 404/873 = 46.28%. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 12:55, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Opinion polling on Scottish independence. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 14:05, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Opinion polling on Scottish independence, you may be blocked from editing. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 14:47, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Opinion polling on Scottish independence. . Please discuss this at the talk page. I have outlined why the correct figures are 47–46. Please provide some justification for your figures, Simply imposing your unsourced figures is vandalism. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 15:23, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Please use the article talk pages to justify your edits. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 16:24, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. EddieHugh (talk) 21:06, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Neil N  talk to me 21:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Mifter (talk) 01:22, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. You come off block and make the same edit again? Why??? Jmorrison230582 (talk) 19:24, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 19:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

April 2017


You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. You come off block and make the same edit again? Why??? Jmorrison230582 (talk) 21:09, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Page 5 of the tables give the relevant figures. 47% yes, 46% no. Or, to be more precise, 410/873 = 46.96% and 404/873 = 46.28%. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 09:09, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

YouGov poll of 2–5 Oct 2017
The value is given in the right column, not the one on the left, which simply recalls the result of the previous poll. Mélencron (talk) 01:20, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

April 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Banff and Buchan (UK Parliament constituency). startTerminal (haha wow talk page) 05:15, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Proposed second Scottish independence referendum. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. You cannot just remove something like that without justification. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 20:45, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Proposed second Scottish independence referendum, you may be blocked from editing. Why are you removing this poll? Jmorrison230582 (talk) 20:57, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Proposed second Scottish independence referendum. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 21:51, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 22:15, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

November 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Opinion polling on Scottish independence. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 23:52, 10 December 2018 (UTC)