User talk:77.102.82.101

November 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Zeus (malware) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:36, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Zeus (malware) was changed by 77.102.82.101 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96482 on 2016-11-09T12:36:11+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Zeus (malware), you may be blocked from editing. Yinf (talk) 12:40, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Minima ©  ( talk ) 15:20, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2017
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Amiga Sidecar have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 22:11, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Macintosh TV. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Marianna251TALK 19:06, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Macintosh IIx, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 15:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Glossary of video game terms. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Glossary of video game terms was changed by 77.102.82.101 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.977331 on 2017-11-12T15:59:34+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:59, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

August 2018
Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to MOS Technology 6502 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 15:25, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pentium Pro. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 15:25, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fuck (July 27)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Fuck Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:21, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Fuck


Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Fuck, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ComplexRational (talk) 14:51, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Neil S. Walker (talk) 10:17, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2020
Hello, I'm Mz7. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Mac Pro—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Mz7 (talk) 23:38, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Mac Pro; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. /Tpdwkouaa (talk) 22:20, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.