User talk:77.103.88.137

December 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Shahab-3, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Shahab-3 was changed by 77.103.88.137 (u) (t) deleting 9093 characters on 2008-12-11T21:03:20+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:03, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

WMD iraq
You can not just put "so and so magazine has disparaging remarks about this person" and leave it at that. Please see WP:RS, specifically http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:RS#News_organizations Opinion pieces are only reliable for statements as to the opinion of their authors, not for statements of fact, SJSA 13:34, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * right, if you want to put something along the lines of "so and so disagrees with x remarks because of x y and z (see citation for confirmation)" that's fine. But as it is written now, its not apparent whats being said in the article(s) being cited. SJSA 20:39, 31 December 2008 (UTC)