User talk:77.123.149.83

Your edits to Mary Carillo
Please do not continue to restore that paragraph to the article until you provide some good justification on the talk page. If it really is an accurate picture of her standing in the tennis community, then I'm sure you'll have no trouble finding suitable references. Blokhead 22:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for finally providing some kind of a source, although mentioning one source in your edit summary is not sufficient to suddenly make the same paragraph NPOV. Additionally, discussion forums like that are not considered reliable sources on wikipedia. However, the first post in the thread you referenced did have a cut-n-paste from a column in some newspaper. I searched online and found the original column. The facts mentioned in it are very relevant to the article and worth mentioning. So I have added a brief note about it to the Mary Carillo article, and included the reference. Feel free to expand it, as long as you stick to verifiable facts, presented in a NPOV. Do not keep reverting back the same POV paragraph again and again. Blokhead 16:32, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors.  Melsaran  (talk) 15:06, 4 September 2007 (UTC)