User talk:77.125.62.164

June 2022
Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Gatestone Institute have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. >>> Ingenuity . talk ; 15:19, 24 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello Ingenuity.
 * More than once I have read articles from the Gatestone Institute. Your own article is totally biased in making this institution a "far right" or even worse "anti-Muslim" media. Most of its articles are factual and its point of view is simply at odds with a certain idea that the extreme left has of Islam. I did not present a personal opinion but tried to restore a truth. Moreover, you do not say a word about its founder, Nina Rosenwald, while even Wikipedia, a media that is often biased in favor of terrorist organizations, considers her a patron of the arts and someone committed to human rights. Please revise your presentation, so that I don't have to come back regularly to do so, even if it means getting banned. Your presentation of the Gatestone is shamefully unfair! 77.125.62.164 (talk) 12:08, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Gatestone Institute. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Squeakachu (talk) 18:17, 24 June 2022 (UTC)


 * More than once I have read articles from the Gatestone Institute. This article is totally biased in making this institution a "far right" or even worse "anti-Muslim" media. Most of its articles are factual and its point of view is simply at odds with a certain idea that the extreme left has of Islam. I did not present a personal opinion but tried to restore a truth. Moreover, you do not say a word about its founder, Nina Rosenwald, while even Wikipedia, a media that is often biased in favor of terrorist organizations, considers her a patron of the arts and someone committed to human rights. Please revise your presentation, so that I don't have to come back regularly to do so, even if it means getting banned. Your presentation of the Gatestone is shamefully unfair! 77.125.62.164 (talk) 12:10, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Gatestone Institute, you may be blocked from editing. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 09:45, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gatestone Institute. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 09:48, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Gatestone Institute) for a period of 1 week for edit warring and pov editing. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 10:30, 25 June 2022 (UTC)