User talk:77.125.76.31

Always a fallacy?
Is "tu quoque" always fallacy? If A's claim to B, "you are X", entails an unfavorable judgment of both X and (therefore) B, then in many cases it is implicit that A does not see herself as X. If B can prove that any definition of X that encompasses herself would also encompass A, then the conclusion is either 1. Neither A nor B is X, OR 2. Both A and B are X. Obviously, A would not want to accept 2, so she is forced to conclude that 1.