User talk:77.218.246.126

November 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 19:12, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Why do you prevent me from editing? This is not an agreed-upon piece of information, but rather a Shiite point of view. Why do you leave it in Wikipedia as if it were a fact?


 * I see, can you provide a quote from some work by Muna Haeri Bilgrami? Shellwood (talk) 19:47, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

She has written two books, (The Victory of Truth the Life of Zaynab Bint Ali) and (a victory of truth in the life of hazrat zainab),Both books have a clear Shiite doctrine, family (Haeri) is a well-known shiite family, There are a few of Shiite mullahs from the family, for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdul-Karim_Haeri_Yazdi https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kazem_al-Haeri.

{unblock | reason=My edits is not vandalism,This is not an agreed-upon piece of information, but rather a Shiite point of view, Both sources are Shiites, This is This is also a Shiite site http://www.aimislam.com/about-us/, and Muna Haeri is Shiite researcher 77.218.246.126 (talk) 21:22, 14 November 2018 (UTC)}

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Yazid I. theinstantmatrix (talk) 19:31, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Why do you prevent me from editing? This is not an agreed-upon piece of information, but rather a Shiite point of view. Why do you leave it in Wikipedia as if it were a fact? This is not Vandalism! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.218.246.126 (talk) 19:43, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 21:05, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

How can I achieve consensus on my edits? They absolutely reject my views. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.218.246.126 (talk • contribs)
 * That's your problem. If you can't achieve consensus, you most certainly cannot engage in edit-warring to try to force your view. If you cannot achieve consensus, you should not make your edit; your block was appropriate given your actions. --Yamla (talk) 23:52, 14 November 2018 (UTC) So why force their point of view?! Why do I have to reach consensus with them and they do not have to reach agreement with me?! And why that's my problem? Why that's not thier problem?!

What should I do if the other person rejects my argument? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.218.246.126 (talk • contribs)
 * WP:CONSENSUS explains all of this. --Yamla (talk) 11:37, 15 November 2018 (UTC)