User talk:77.222.27.61

February 2023
Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Seattle General Strike—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Wikipelli Talk  23:35, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Seattle General Strike shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 23:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC)


 * I just tried to fix an article that was clearly vandalized. It says in the table that it resulted in "Arrests of strikers" and "Build up of the First Red Scare". Is me not being logged into an account the problem? 77.222.27.61 (talk) 00:05, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
 * No. I'm not convinced it was clearly vandalized. However, you have made a clear case for the edit on the article's talk page—and if anybody reverts it back, I will revert it with a note to see the discussion on the talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 00:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)