User talk:77.249.241.14

Welcome!

Hello, 77.249.241.14, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Please consider creating an account, to establish a stable identity here in Wikipedia. Jytdog (talk) 10:39, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:24, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 12:38, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Hasidic Judaism.  Ogress  smash!  00:29, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your edit at Persian Jews was also unsourced, and your edit at Sicherheitsdienst was poorly sourced for the amount of material and represented undue weight, although the two people probably merit articles here and it is possible that the material would fit better in another article. (I am not sure, because you appear to be confusing collaboration with Nazi Party membership.) I have reverted both edits for these reasons and also because the English was unacceptably poor, making it hard to understand an evaluate the material. Possibly you would do better editing the Wikipedia in your native language? But either way, you must have references for all the material; if you have personal knowledge, find references to support it. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:10, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Tutelary. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Swastika with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tutelary (talk) 19:52, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring at pfizer
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Pfizer. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jytdog (talk) 10:37, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

I just created a section on the Pfizer page for you to discuss your edits. Please see Talk:Pfizer/Archives/2014 and respond there. thanks.Jytdog (talk) 11:29, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Off to a difficult start
Hi 77.249.241.14. You are off to a difficult start here! For what it is worth, i suggest that you slow down and start discussing things with other editors. Discussion is essential to how Wikipedia functions, per our fundamental policy WP:CONSENSUS. if you keep editing aggressively and not talking with other editors, you are going to end up blocked or banned. Editing Wikipedia is privilege offered to all, but it can be revoked if users don't follow Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I linked to key ones above - please take some time and learn about them! thanks. Jytdog (talk) 10:43, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Neutral point of view, verification, original research, and what Wikipedia is not
77.249.241.14, along with reviewing the policy on edit warring that is discussed above, I also want to warn you to carefully read the policies we have on neutral point of view, no original research, verification of content, and what Wikipedia is not. This set of edits, this set of edits, and this set of edits] violate all those policies, along with the edit warring policy, as you have re-added them after they were deleted, without discussing them. If you continue editing in this way, you will get blocked to call your attention to the problem, and if you persist beyond that, you will lose your editing privileges altogether. So please slow down and learn more how to edit Wikipedia. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 10:56, 29 October 2014 (UTC)