User talk:77.254.234.150

January 2023
Hello, I'm Chiswick Chap. I noticed that you recently removed content from Bag End without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Hi, Wikipedia is for everyone. You can't just remove descriptions of opinions you personally don't agree with; we objectively describe whatever scholars and journalists have said. Thanks for your understanding.'' Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:31, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bag End. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. ''No, that's not 'with respect', that's edit-warring and intolerance; the material is relevant, neutral, and reliably-cited, so you can't delete it without wide consensus, and so far you've been reverted by 2 different editors. If you continue you will face a prolonged block.'' Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:26, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

77.254.234.150 Exactly, Wikipedia is for everyone. Sources can be found for every view point for every topic, from the alt-left to the alt-right. Meanwhile the goal is to keep the message without political or ideological influence. The cited publications misinterpret the words "very rich and very peculiar", "queer" in a very modern context.