User talk:77.29.179.180

Notice
Hello IP. I appreciate your contributions, but there are some issues with your contributions that I need to clarify to you. When reliable sources treat something as a claim, we treat it as a claim too. It's important to follow what the reliable sources say. When it comes to Operation MH-2, reliable sources treat the casualty figure 30 as a claim. If there was truth to it, it'd be already independently verified. As for Battle of Raduša, one source is not gonna cut it for the alleged KPC involvement. Also, per MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE, the infobox summarizes content that appears in the article's body. There isn't anything about KPC in the article's body. I'd suggest you to start a talk page discussion on the article's talk page to make your case about their involvement (where you can present more sources, if you have any) and probably also on Talk:2001 insurgency in Macedonia. I also have never gotten a good reason why claims should be present in infoboxes. Best regards. StephenMacky1 (talk) 15:28, 6 October 2023 (UTC) StephenMacky1 (talk) 15:28, 6 October 2023 (UTC)