User talk:77.86.7.101

January 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Amy Johnson has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:12, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Amy Johnson was changed by 77.86.7.101 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.8647 on 2017-01-04T12:11:59+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Amy Johnson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 7Sidz (talk) 12:12, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Amy Johnson, you may be blocked from editing. 73.96.112.124 (talk) 12:14, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of people from Yorkshire. — Iambic Pentameter (talk / contribs) 15:09, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Amy Johnson has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:12, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Amy Johnson was changed by 77.86.7.101 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96029 on 2017-01-26T15:12:06+00:00.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. – Gilliam (talk) 06:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

March 2018
Hello, I'm 72. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. –72 (talk)  14:14, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at William Wilberforce. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:14, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: William Wilberforce was changed by 77.86.7.101 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.878273 on 2018-03-12T14:14:34+00:00.

June 2018
Hello, I'm Abelmoschus Esculentus. An edit you recently made to Islamic_religious_leaders seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 13:12, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of FIFA World Cup winners has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:43, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of FIFA World Cup winners was changed by 77.86.7.101 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.971206 on 2018-06-13T09:43:40+00:00.

October 2018
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Scratch (programming language)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   14:12, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Trench warfare— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 10:13, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Home Guard (United Kingdom). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Flooded w/ them 100s  10:24, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Home Guard (United Kingdom), you may be blocked from editing. -- Flooded w/ them 100s  10:28, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Home Guard (United Kingdom). -- Flooded w/ them 100s  10:34, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Edith Cavell—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 14:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to White-cheeked spider monkey—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:11, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Artifact (archaeology). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.   Zudo (talk) 13:38, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.