User talk:77.99.71.71

September 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jimmy Clitheroe‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:46, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jimmy Clitheroe, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 12:51, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2018
Hello, I'm Pablomartinez. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Sophie Howard— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PabloMartinez (talk) 20:58, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Chitty Bang Bang, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RedUser (talk) 01:09, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Red Peppers, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 15:08, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Hello, I'm Geunineart. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Philip MacDonald have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Genuine Art 14:28, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2018
Hello, I'm Jith12. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Nelly Power, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jith12 (talk) 21:39, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I see that you added further uncited information to Nelly Power. I have hidden it. If you can cite your sources, we can add the information. Please either add your sources to the article, or the article Talk page. See WP:V for more information. -- Ssilvers (talk) 09:32, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (77.99.71.71) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 03:13, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello, I'm Mahveotm. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Proof Positive (Greene story)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Mahveotm (talk) 22:33, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Hello, I'm PCN02WPS. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Mousetrap, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. PCN02WPS ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 01:45, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Knives Out (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 17:52, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Christopher_Caudwell. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Why did you change the name Caudwell to Sprigg? Viewratio (talk) 22:30, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Christopher Caudwell, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Christopher Caudwell was changed by 77.99.71.71 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.928534 on 2019-12-30T22:37:53+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:37, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Christopher Caudwell, you may be blocked from editing. Ifnord (talk) 22:39, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

thanks for your work on John Palmer (author)
Thanks. could you please provide a reference for your updates to the article? I'm sure the edits are accurate, but Wikipedia needs references. If you do not know how to add a ref, please just stick it on the talk page in any random format whatsoever and I will clean it up.

In anther note: you are editing from an IP address, and this particular IP address has been used a lot in the past for juvenile vandalism, almost certainly by others. You can avoid being associated with this and seeing the unpleasant warnings by creating an account. the account makes you MORE anonymous, not less, because when you don't log in, we see your IP address, which tells us the city where you are editing from. -Arch dude (talk) 19:46, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at A. E. W. Mason. Binksternet (talk) 20:14, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Cecil Street. Binksternet (talk) 20:17, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

When you think you're in the right....
You've just been blocked by another admin for your disruptive attitude to editing. If you find another editor either disagrees with you, or even places a note on your page to say 'stop doing that', the way to behave is not to revert and call them an idiot, but to point out politely why you think they are wrong and why you think you are correct in your view. And you should supply a source to support it. You never know - they'll probably be happy to admit to an error if you can point out precisely why they made a mistake

Looking back at your talk page you seem to have a habit of adding stuff to Wikipedia without citing sources. Had you simply said "Hey, I didn't vandalize anything. You were a bit harsh with that warning, weren't you mate? Here's a source that shows 'Marjorie Strode' is a genuine play by AEW Mason see this", then you'd not be getting into conflict, and finding yourself blocked. If you feel wronged, just go explain why, and in a nice manner. Please try and collaborate with other editors in future, OK? Cheers, Nick Moyes (talk) 00:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delving into your editing a bit further, I can guess that you have studied in some detail and published on the people whose articles you have been editing. If I may suggest for any future editing that you register for an account, declare your professional knowledge and interest in these subjects, and make a point of only ever adding information that has already been put into the public domain that anyone else can verify for themselves. The fact that you happen to know something because you're a scholar in one subject or another doesn't, unfortunately, impress editors here. They need sources, and if you're not able or willing to cite source - even to one of your own publications - then don't put it in in the first place. Sadly, many editors have had bad experiences with unregistered IP editors, and tend to conclude they're up to no good.
 * If you happen to have a penchant for tracking down lost, forgotten and unknown work by various writers, just be open about it and we can guide and support you to contribute effectively, and gently steer you away from some of the basic mistakes that people can make which gets them into these unnecessary conflicts. Cheers, Nick Moyes (talk) 01:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Endless Night (novel), you may be blocked from editing. 17jiangz1 (talk) 14:21, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.