User talk:77siddhartha/Archive 1

RE: Revert wars
"Skip, if you are having problems with User:Technocrate, please seek out an administrator before getting into a revert war with him. To an admin, your reverts look just as bad as his. --77siddhartha 06:40, 19 June 2007 (UTC)" Please do not post things like this on my page again. I suggest that that person be engaged, but that person has never been engaged. That person is only a soldier here for NET. "we do need a team to maintain it correctly." quote, Andrew Wallace. (skip sievert 06:53, 19 June 2007 (UTC))


 * I wish it were that simple Sidd. I tried appealing to wafulz who seemed to not understand or care about what was going on. I think for the most part he is the overseer of the page. I am sorry if I barked at you. I have been blindsided by ignorant people here from the beginning. I am interested in the 'truth' of this as you seem to be. You are probably right about getting someones attention about Technocrate. He did these same exact reverts when I first arrived then disappeared for a while. He has never creatively done any thing.

Would you mind doing it, blowing the whistle, or bringing it to the attention of wafulz, or better yet a different editor admin. I would appreciate that. He does not seem disposed toward me. I have tried many times to engage him.


 * I agree with your suggestion, but I have found no support here for any real thoughtful discussion except from you, so that makes the two of us, and a team of people here will not allow any thing hardly but their concepts. Kolzene by the way edited the Ttcd a few years ago, and that should automatically prevent its use here. Kolzene and Cordsmeyer who has 'captured' Chq Washington have started therefore this 'false branch' I would not dignify it as being a part of the movement. It is not. They 'say' all kinds of things, none of which are connected. I hope you understand here Sidd that money is involved here. About 6 million dollars. That is the kitty at Chq Washington.

How do I Know ? That would be telling for now, but we have the papers to prove it. Let me refer you to this exchange http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dfx7rfr2_26d3mgwv Q&A.Ttcd.Faq`s material. Discredited information. Technocracy Inc. This is a file I have made to document part of this. Would I like to see a totally accurate and creatively done page here ? Would I like to see the 'truth' being told here ? Yes, that is all I want. Wafulz did not seem to care or understand that that page has been hijacked by belief system flunky`s. They are interested in their sociological concepts that are unrelated to Technocracy. If you go to Net for instance or TechCa, that is what they discuss. Moral values, punishing people or rewarding them with 'energy credits' which they refer on the Net site to as 'E.C.' - The amazing thing here is that even after the TTCD was brought to prominence, so much good writing was still done on TechInc.Washington, such as this classic and brilliant piece http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dfx7rfr2_33cjmnmb Can Technology Destroy Us? Technocracy Information.Stepen L Doll. Unedited file. I hate to see this, but you are the only one here with a quick grasp of these issues besides myself. Because you obviously are pretty good at being objective, and also a pretty good editor, I would ask that you use your knowledge to try and improve things here. As Eugene P. would say 'why not get at the truth' Ha. The old wiki joke about cabal is really pretty funny. This also is a good example of a cabal, as these players are 'believers' in that discredited and pathetically ignorant material, the Q&A TTCD Faq`s file.(skip sievert 16:32, 19 June 2007 (UTC))