User talk:77wonders/Archive 1

Welcome!
Hi 77wonders! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:46, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Hunyadi family. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:46, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Kun Kipcsak. I noticed that you recently removed content from User talk:77wonders without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kun Kipcsak (talk) 12:30, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Battle of Baia
Hello,

Could I ask you why primarly sources are not important about the battle in the wikipedia page of the battle?

The page is already using many primarly sources, for example the image of the battle and the Moldavian flag is from the contemporary Chronicle Hungarorum. Why we need to ignore the text from the same document and use only the images? The contemporary text says clearly this battle was a Hungarian victory, also I can show you at least 5 contemporary documents what say cleary the same: Janus Pannonius, András Hess: Buda Chronicle (1473), Johannes de Thurocz: Chronica Hungarorum (1488), Antonio Bonfini: Rerum Ungaricarum Decades (1488-1497), Petrus Ransanus: Epithoma rerum Hungarorum (1490). I can copy-paste the text about the battle from these documents. It means the victory of Stephen is not clear, why many contemporary Hungarian sources say different? King Matthias fought in this battle, why do you want to ignore the sources from his court about his battle? Why do you want to see only secondary later sources and only from the other side? I think it is not fair to ignore the other side. I would like to see a balanced wikipedia page about the battle where all sides can show their sources. Romanian sources can it was Moldavian vitory, Hungarian sources can it was Hungarian victory. Why it would be a problem? Furthermore I have strong primarly sources about my statement.

Best Regards, OrionNimrod — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orionnimrod (talk • contribs) 12:59, 13 October 2021 (UTC)