User talk:78.144.71.58

December 2019
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sid and Nancy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 17:26, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
 * The edit summary was perfectly clear, within the constraints of the character limit. I have corrected your (rather presumptuous and insulting) misapprehension both on your talk page and in the edit summary of my second correction of the inaccurate quotations you restored. Please try to pursue these things less doggedly and avoid such mistakes in future- over-zealousness doesn't benefit anyone, and certainly doesn't benefit the Wikipedia project.

Hmmm, so this is the kind of behaviour indulged in by those wielding power here? Very impressive, I don't think. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AFlightTime&type=revision&diff=930613083&oldid=930612422

Despite the fact that I- again- informed this user that the quotes as contained in the article prior to my edit were not correct, and that the book- to which I had directly referred in providing the corrections I made- gave different text, his response was 'Too busy for this, continued addition of unsourced content by this user will eventually be handled. This discussion/section is closed'. Congratulations on an impressive abuse of power, sir.