User talk:78.144.80.18

July 2018
Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Neil N  talk to me 21:55, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Civility with others
The message you left here on MrDemeanour's user talk page was absolutely not acceptable. It violates Wikipedia's policy on civility, contains personal attacks (which are not allowed on Wikipedia), and is not in compliance with the expected level of cordiality, professionalism, and respect that you're expected to reflect and with each message and every message that you make. Please take time and do what's needed to make sure that all of your future messages and responses comply with these policies. Proper communication and collaboration is very important for article improvements and expansions to be successful and reflect the best quality content possible to the reader; anything other than respectful and civil correspondence is not acceptable and will not be tolerated. Thank you :-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   12:00, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

For the record...
User are allowed to remove messages, warnings, and templates and essentially blank their own talk page if they wish to do so (with the exception of a few things). See this section of Wikipedia's policies on user pages for more information about this. There are some messages and templates that users cannot remove (most of them are templates regarding someone's active block and only while they're under that active block) - that section of Wikipedia's policy on user pages list those messages and situations there. Please let me know if you have any questions about this and I'll be happy to answer them. Cheers :-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   12:26, 8 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The editors who know 'the truth' about the White helmets are indulged and protected, and you talk about  the need for 'collaboration', as if you can't see they aren't interested in that. But keep blocking the democrats and anti- Fascists.  For 'incivility',   I thought the point is the articles here. I'm satisfied I haven't damaged the actual content of any article  and that is the main thing.  I read that section . 'Archiving is preferred'.  ( Now, why would that be? ) But, in the meantime,  some rules get enforced (Civility), while others,  violating NPOV systematically, are let go hang. It was ever thus.

Ive been told the user name 'terrorist' is fine, too. the editor apparently said 'my name is just a bunch of letters and numbers' and he had a 'sentimental' attachment to it, some other (like minded friends of that editor?) editors voted that it wasnt provocative, and so admins told me  to accept the username 'terrorist' was not 'provocative'. this place is nuts. seriously flawed as fuck.

July 2018
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 19:35, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You were warned about making comments like this. --Neil N  talk to me 19:37, 8 July 2018 (UTC)