User talk:78.148.94.191

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Dan Gosling has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. QueenCake (talk) 20:38, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Please do not make test edits to articles, as you did with this edit to Dan Gosling, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits constitute vandalism, and will be reverted. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Allmightyduck (talk) 22:44, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Hello. I've undone your recent edits to Dan Gosling because the information about Mr Gosling's father was unsourced, and because the opinion about Everton fans' view of Mr Gosling is just that, an opinion. If you have a reliable published source for Mr Gosling senior's thoughts, you're welcome to add those back in, together with a link to that source; without a reliable published source, it has to be removed by Wikipedia policy WP:Biographies of living persons. But your view of what the fans think isn't appropriate to an encyclopedia article, by Wikipedia policy WP:No original research. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 23:11, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Dan Gosling. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Allmightyduck (talk) 23:25, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Dan Gosling, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The Daily Mail'' report doesn't mention Mr Gosling's father. Please stop adding unsourced and potentially libellous material about living people.'' Struway2 (talk) 23:38, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:01, 8 July 2010 (UTC)