User talk:78.152.221.21

Hello 78.152.221.21, after reviewing your content removal, I have found that the "controversy" section is not vandalism and has used several citetations of reliable sources. It is important that both the positive and negative of Asociations or People are known even if they are not faveurable as long as they are facts. If you disagree, you may discuss this on the article's talk page. Lakwat (talk) 13:10, 2 June 2021 (UTC)