User talk:78.157.68.60

November 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Electro music has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.  The thing that sho uld not be   16:42, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article List of equipment of the Russian Ground Forces, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. GcSwRhIc (talk) 14:52, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2013
Hello, I'm Discospinster. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to 2013 Italian Grand Prix, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ... disco spinster   talk  14:56, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:59, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

June 2014
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Babymetal, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Randor1980 (talk| |contributions) 13:30, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2014
Hello, I'm Denisarona. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Alessandra Mussolini because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Denisarona (talk) 15:34, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

August 2015
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Babymetal— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 14:01, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Neil N  talk to me 14:03, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Re: Lithuania football logo

 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Frank Ntilikina
Knicks twitter account is a good enough .--MarcusPearl95 (talk) 00:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Not Broken
I should point out that you reverting because of Not Broken is also violating Not Broken because those links weren't broken. While they shouldn't be changing them you also shouldn't be reverting them. -DJSasso (talk) 12:43, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The other IP user introduced a piped link, which doesn't improve it. I also don't violate the WP:NOTBROKEN policy as it clearly says that redirects shouldn't be replaced for no good reason. – 78.157.68.60 (talk) 15:08, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * You are right that it wasn't overly helpful for them to make that change, I didn't dispute that. But it also works the other way, your revert back was changing for no good reason since the article is unlikely to ever change from Detroit for example. Generally both types of changes are considered to be against notbroken. The spirit of the guideline is that you should always just leave them as you find them unless there is a very important reason for it to be changed. Either way its not a big deal but I thought I would point it out when a bunch of your changes showed up on my watchlist because I have seen get into trouble for going around reverting such changes as well. -DJSasso (talk) 14:56, 29 November 2017 (UTC)