User talk:78.174.2.133

My contribution the Pascal Najadi's page
Hi there, Why do you keep deleting the whole "Controversy" section I've added to Najadi's page?

Your note mentions X/Twitter as being an unreliable source.But: 1. The first part "Interviews & Articles" links to a press website (diefreien.ch) and to 2020news.de, which is curated by a german lawyer. No trace of twitter here. 2. The second part "X/Twitter" documents Najadi's own journey on Twitter, so yeah, there are obviously links to twitter, which is the whole point. 3. Third part "World Event" documents Najadi's own annoucement. No twitter here. 4. Fourth part "Hussain Najadi" links to an interview of Najadi and to a conversation with his father on youtube. No twitter here. 5. Fifth part "Tribunal" has a link to a video that's only to be found on twitter. I'll try to find it elsewhere if that's better.

Based on that, please tell me why you consider this "Controversy" section as "disruptive" and as "vandalism". Pierrech (talk) 09:35, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

No Vandalism Notice (For the IP Address)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Pascal Najadi. StewieGriffin&EricCartman (talk) 3:36, 2 November 2023 (UTC)