User talk:78.202.201.62

March 2022
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Order of Saint Stephen, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. —C.Fred (talk) 23:54, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pedro Téllez-Girón y de la Cueva, 1st Duke of Osuna. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''Your edits do not use proper capitalization. Please explain how your edits are constructive and what reliable sources support your changes.'' —C.Fred (talk) 23:57, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Louis-René Levassor de Latouche Tréville, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. —C.Fred (talk) 23:58, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi 78.202.201.62! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Federico Gravina several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at Talk:Federico Gravina, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. InterstateFive (talk) - just another roadgeek 23:59, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Martín Alonso Fernández de Córdoba Montemayor y Velasco, conde de Alcaudete. Your failure to capitalize "Ottoman" suggests that you are not editing in good faith. —C.Fred (talk) 00:00, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —C.Fred (talk) 00:00, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Ottoman propaganda
Ottoman propagandist will not stop me, as you didn't manage stop the spanish, french, english, russian, danish and other civilized navies from crushing you between the 16th and 19thcenturies, bombing your cities on the occupied algeria, tunisia and libya. The european navies even launched successful naval expedition against anatolia, to liberate it from ottoman disguting occupation !


 * Thank you for confirming that your intent is to advance a point of view and not to build an encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 00:12, 26 March 2022 (UTC)