User talk:78.222.50.74

I don't agree that my removal of the information edit that you undid for Journal of Advanced Nursing was not irrelevant material - it is all contained in the info box and I was concerned that the journal was appearing to get 'two bites of the cherry'. It would pay you to be a bit more polite in your public comments but of course, your acting anonymously, so no cost to you. I may have a COI (not a 'giant' one - that is just childish banter) but if you think that those who edit the pages of some leading medical journals (which I won't name for fear of litigation) don't have a COI and are not fed the information to put up on Wikipedia then I am not sure in which world you are living. At least I am not hiding behind anonymity - which, of course, I could easily choose to do - in correcting and tidying up the webpage. All the same, in the spirit of Wikipedia, I thank you for your comment and correction - and respectfully ask that you undo your undoing of my edit Rwatson1955 (talk) 19:53, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Infoboxes summarize info that should be present (and sourced where necessary) in the text of the article. (ISSNs and such don't need to be sourced, foundation dates come from the journal's website, but IFs need to be sourced in the text). --78.222.50.74 (talk) 08:46, 16 September 2018 (UTC)