User talk:78.55.225.215

Your edits to "Anno Domini"
Please don't put excess detail into the lead of an article. The lead should give a brief overview of the article.

If you want to put more detail into the Historical birth date of Jesus section, that might be appropriate, although a case could be made that any detailed discussion should go in Nativity of Jesus or Chronology of Jesus, which are referred to in Anno Domini. In any case, please word any changes carefully. For example, in this context, "assumed" would mean picking a particular date even though there is insufficient evidence to confirm the date (which is exactly what Dionysius Exiguus did). It isn't appropriate to say modern scholars have assumed a date for the nativity of Jesus. Jc3s5h (talk) 15:42, 27 February 2014 (UTC)