User talk:78.70.161.206

April 2022
Hello, I'm Dave.Dunford. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to North Moreton seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dave.Dunford (talk) 18:14, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to North Moreton. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''The BBC article says "Up to 45 refugees could be housed.." (which you are reporting as if 50 people have already been housed). There is no evidence for your assertions about the hosts' attitudes to homeless people in Britain, or the opinions of other people to their actions. You are misrepresenting the facts to present your own opinion. This is not how Wikipedia works.'' Dave.Dunford (talk) 07:33, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dave.Dunford (talk) 10:23, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Dave.Dunford (talk) 10:32, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Oscar Wilde. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Sjö (talk) 08:53, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 4 months for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 14:25, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.