User talk:78.86.164.251

Please justify your negative edits to the page. Too many of your edits are factually incorrect and opinion based.

Tim Kash edits
Too many negative and opinion based edits? Please clarify which parts are too negative for a Wikipedia article and are also POV and factually incorrect.

The "negative" parts of Kash's career are supported by references to BBC News, IMDb and the Independent, and reflect the hype, positive and colourful language used in the current article, especially the hype about his time at TOTP but says nothing about the subsequent reviews and judgements made about him from critics and audiences that led to him being dropped from one of the BBC's flagship shows.

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:32, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Apologies, advice has been noted - thank you. 78.86.164.251 (talk) 11:34, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

September 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Speech Debelle has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Petiatil&raquo;Talk 22:29, 26 September 2011 (UTC)