User talk:79.106.95.43

nearly anyone questioned would consider "mace" as a generic term for pepper spray or other personal defense spray. the word "mace" is also commonly used as a verb (e.g., the perp would not stop the attack so he was "maced" in order to apprehend him), which is another indication that a brand name has been genericized. on what basis was the phrase "Mace is the genericized trademark of Chemical Mace" removed under this edit?

This is an opinion. I wouldn't consider the Mace (r) Brand name as a substitute for pepper spray. Futhermore, a trademark can only be considered generic if the trademark is ruled as such by a court. That is the basis on which the generization allegation was removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.236.220.210 (talk) 15:51, 13 September 2019 (UTC)