User talk:79.12.2.83

I've been unfairly accused of vandalizing pages, i'm just putting the result that the UFC announced, using a source and by the rules of a finish in MMA, Sherdog isn't always reliable when it comes to results, they don't even understand the difference between KO/TKO, Submission or Technical Submission, and that's not my opinion, just look at the matches and see for yourself, look at the MMA/UFC rules and look at what they impose, you always use vandalization as an excuse, Sherdog has misinformation in it. Don't blame me for giving the real source with the results, and please, watch the fights before you look on a site.

July 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at African leopard. Stop putting in IUCN statuses for taxa not assessed nor recognized by the IUCN. Mr Fink (talk) 13:41, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of largest cats. ''This link does not work. Stop.'' Unbh (talk) 18:51, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at UFC 57.  Cassiopeia  talk  07:12, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Tim Sylvia, you may be blocked from editing.  Cassiopeia  talk  07:16, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Randy Couture.  Cassiopeia  talk  07:16, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cody Garbrandt.  Cassiopeia  talk  07:36, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

fight methods - mma fighter fight records
Hi, pls note that the mma fighter fight records fight method is as per Sherdog based on Wikipedia MMA guidlines. Pls do not change the methods. If you find any source state otherwise, you need to provide all possible sources fight method for comparisons first in the talk page of the article and wait for consensus decision which usually the discussion would take at least one week. Cassiopeia  talk  07:15, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

I didn't get the hamg because Sherdog has misinformation issues, i gave the sources, i gave everything and i'm still beign accused of vandalizing. Keep in mind what the MMA/UFC rules are, keep in mind about the fight finish methods. Sherdog owners probably don't even watch some fights or either can't tell the difference between KO ot TKO or between Submission or Technical Submission. People should watch fights before just going on a site and writing false things. I watched tha fights, i watched the rules, i watched the true source. For example: every source about Garbrandt vs Dillashaw 2 states that the result is a TKO, and it is a TKO if you watch the fight and the result was announced as such...probably something that Sherdog owners didn't watch. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.44.9.25 (talk) 18:19, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

https://www.mmafighting.com/2018/8/4/17650354/ufc-227-results-dillashaw-vs-garbrandt-2

https://www.thescrap.com/ufc-227-results-dillashaw-vs-garbrandt-2/

https://www.mmaweekly.com/ufc-227-results-dillashaw-vs-garbrandt-2-full-results-and-live-fight-stats-los-angeles

https://www.cbssports.com/mma/news/ufc-227-results-highlights-tj-dillashaw-knocks-out-cody-garbrandt-to-retain-bantamweight-title/

https://fansided.com/2018/08/04/ufc-227-live-results-tracker/

https://www.bloodyelbow.com/ufc-227-dillashaw-vs-garbrandt-2/2018/8/3/17649118/ufc-227-tj-dillashaw-vs-cody-garbrandt-2-live-results-play-by-play-analysis-highlights-more

https://www.fightersonlymag.com/latest-news/ufc-227-tj-dillashaw-vs-cody-garbrandt-live-results-demetrious-johnson-henry-cejudo/

https://www.bjpenn.com/mma-news/ufc-227/ufc-227-results-tj-dillashaw-vs-cody-garbrandt-2/

https://www.espn.com/mma/story/_/id/24288464/tj-dillashaw-defeats-cody-garbrandt-first-round-tko-defend-bantamweight-title-ufc-227

https://www.sacnilk.com/news/UFC_227_Results_Winners_Venue_Attendance

https://www.fightbookmma.com/ufc-227-dillashaw-vs-garbrandt-2-salaries-with-four-fighters-earning-six-figures/

https://www.ufc.com/news/ufc-227-final-results

Here are at least 10 sources that state otherwise, including UFC itself — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.21.139.55 (talk) 19:11, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Fight records
Hi. Please stop changing sourced information on fight records. If the information does NOT correspond to the source in the infobox, please ensure it does. If the information DOES correspond to the source but you think it's wrong, then please open a discussion on the talk page in question and support your opinion with reliable 3rd party sources. Please bear in mind that we don't use UFC as a source, as it's not a 3rd party source and only relates to UFC fighters. Please don't ignore this message and I hope that you can become an asset to the encyclopaedia. At present, you'll see that a very large % of your edits are getting reverted, which suggests you've not quite got the hang of it. Thanks. NEDOCHAN (talk) 14:20, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

I didn't get the hang because Sherdog has misinformation issues, i gave the sources, i gave everything and i'm still beign accused of vandalizing. Keep in mind what the MMA/UFC rules are, keep in mind about the fight finish methods. Sherdog owners probably don't even watch some fights or either can't tell the difference between KO ot TKO or between Submission or Technical Submission. People should watch fights before just going on a site and writing false things. I watched tha fights, i watched the rules, i watched the true source. For example: every source about Garbrandt vs Dillashaw 2 states that the result is a TKO, and it is a TKO if you watch the fight and the result was announced as such...probably something that Sherdog owners didn't watch.

https://www.mmafighting.com/2018/8/4/17650354/ufc-227-results-dillashaw-vs-garbrandt-2

https://www.thescrap.com/ufc-227-results-dillashaw-vs-garbrandt-2/

https://www.mmaweekly.com/ufc-227-results-dillashaw-vs-garbrandt-2-full-results-and-live-fight-stats-los-angeles

https://www.cbssports.com/mma/news/ufc-227-results-highlights-tj-dillashaw-knocks-out-cody-garbrandt-to-retain-bantamweight-title/

https://fansided.com/2018/08/04/ufc-227-live-results-tracker/

https://www.bloodyelbow.com/ufc-227-dillashaw-vs-garbrandt-2/2018/8/3/17649118/ufc-227-tj-dillashaw-vs-cody-garbrandt-2-live-results-play-by-play-analysis-highlights-more

https://www.fightersonlymag.com/latest-news/ufc-227-tj-dillashaw-vs-cody-garbrandt-live-results-demetrious-johnson-henry-cejudo/

https://www.bjpenn.com/mma-news/ufc-227/ufc-227-results-tj-dillashaw-vs-cody-garbrandt-2/

https://www.espn.com/mma/story/_/id/24288464/tj-dillashaw-defeats-cody-garbrandt-first-round-tko-defend-bantamweight-title-ufc-227

https://www.sacnilk.com/news/UFC_227_Results_Winners_Venue_Attendance

https://www.fightbookmma.com/ufc-227-dillashaw-vs-garbrandt-2-salaries-with-four-fighters-earning-six-figures/

https://www.ufc.com/news/ufc-227-final-results

Here are 10 links that prove Sherdog wrong, including UFC itself — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.21.139.55 (talk) 18:46, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Anthony Johnson (fighter), you may be blocked from editing.  Cassiopeia  talk  01:57, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at UFC on Fox: Lawler vs. Brown.  Cassiopeia  talk  01:58, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Antônio Rogério Nogueira.  Cassiopeia  talk  01:59, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

I wasn't disrupting anything, i was just giving the result as it is and i also give you the source, so don't blame me for the problems with the page. I explained to you my motives up above, Sherdog has misinformation issues, it doesn't respect the real results and ignires the basic rules of MMA. It can't tell the difference between KO or TKO or Submission and Technical Submission and it's putting wrong results on the fighters pages. I suggest people should watch the fights and rewatch the rules before puttinf false informations into their content. Sherdog isn't as reliable as you people think. It's better to check directly on their UFC website rather than some other website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.21.139.55 (talk) 19:20, 16 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Again, as mentioned to your before - Sherdog is the source MMA Wikipedia goes by as per guidelines. Wikipedia is not about the truth but what is verifiable. If source is different that of Sherdog, then pls go to the article talk page and state you case and get consensus agreement. Note: UFC is considred not independent nor reliable source in Wikipedia.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>  talk

"Not about the truth but what is verifiable" Seriously!?....this is...you know what...remain on that misinformation site if not even the COMPANY is considered reliable, i'll stay out of this. This is wrong on so many levels, just absolutley wrong. That's not even verifiable if you don't consider what happended in the match, watched it or look at the UFC/MMA rules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.44.9.25 (talk) 10:38, 17 August 2022 (UTC)


 * I understand your opinion. However, this is Wikipedia. Wikipedia core policy is about WP:Verifiability. I do watch the fights and have been for the last 14 years. UFC is not an independent source because it has the association with the fighters and UFC is also not a reliable source because it is company where the info has not fact checking and if you are a UFC fan then you would know Dana White and UFCsaid many times and there are times we knew they were not true nor correct (example: UFC announced certain match up and the fighters not even know the match up as there is no contract even signed or inform the possibility of the match up.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>  talk