User talk:79.132.160.138

August 2018
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Haitian Vodou. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:25, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Vandalism can simply be reverted. Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view.  Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources.  Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.  In the case of religion, this means only reporting what has been written and not taking any stance on doctrine. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:25, 13 August 2018 (UTC)