User talk:79.155.94.28

February 2022
Hello, I'm Asilvering. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Gerhard Schröder have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. asilvering (talk) 17:50, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gerhard Schröder. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. asilvering (talk) 18:35, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. asilvering (talk) 05:36, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

LOOK at the recent edit, i put his current job first. stop engaging in censorship. 79.155.94.28 (talk) 17:15, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Gerhard Schröder. ''Please see MOS:LEADSENTENCE. The information you are adding does not belong in the lead sentence because Schröder is most notable as a German politician. You are welcome to insert the Gazprom info further down.'' Peaceray (talk) 17:39, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

ok, added lower with the other one. Though, since when was it a banable offense not to follow the style manual? That previous edit was not disruptive - all i did was list his current role FIRST. It is HIGHLY POV whether he is most known globally for briefly running germany, or for his current role working for the russian state, during a war. 79.155.94.28 (talk) 17:52, 27 February 2022 (UTC)