User talk:79.166.63.156

Welcome to the Ministry of Truth.

August 2022
Hello, I'm XenonNSMB. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Nazi gun control argument seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. XenonNSMB (talk, contribs) 14:52, 26 August 2022 (UTC)


 * What was not neutral in my edit? 79.166.63.156 (talk) 14:53, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nazi gun control argument, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. &mdash; Ingenuity (talk &bull; contribs) 14:53, 26 August 2022 (UTC)


 * I just remove the opinion of the fact-checkers. Why is the opinion of the fact-checkers relevant to wikipedia? 79.166.63.156 (talk) 14:55, 26 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Can you provide reasoning that these fact-checkers are not reliable sources? See Verifiability for info on Wikipedia's policy in this area. --XenonNSMB (talk, contribs) 15:02, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Historians are scientists. On the other hand fact-checkers just promote their sponsors' agenda. It's at least insulting to equate them. I know it's a heated political argument in USA, and wikipedia promotes a specific point of view, but you can support the same point view only by using select historians. No need for fact-checkers. 79.166.63.156 (talk) 15:07, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Nazi gun control argument, you may be blocked from editing. XenonNSMB (talk, contribs) 15:04, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  &#124;Madeline.  15:05, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * They never attempted to collaborate, they just refer to talk pages everyone that disagrees with wikipedia's opinion in sensitive political issues. 79.166.63.156 (talk) 15:08, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Ministry of Truth (disambiguation). &mdash; Ingenuity (talk &bull; contribs) 15:14, 26 August 2022 (UTC)


 * vandalize? Isn't wikipedia the ministry of truth of our times? 79.166.63.156 (talk) 15:15, 26 August 2022 (UTC)