User talk:79.176.174.2

Response
"If we disregard talk page comments, user page bios, userboxes, or anything else outside of a mainspace edit..." 2600:1010:B32C:3BA0:786D:A3BB:D515:F77A (talk) 17:03, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hi 79.176.174.2! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 09:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 09:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 31 hours Wikipedia. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page:. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. signed,Rosguill talk 19:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC)  Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for WP:ECR violations, you have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 2 weeks Wikipedia. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page:. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


 * nice, censorship all editors who suggest that "unwashed hands" are intimating this procedure instead of listening to all of the "unregisters persons" claims on why that lie should not have been allowed to stay up after he was first reverted without and RFC because it is clearly an a holocaust inversion and he is clearly have engage in an edit war before.
 * the only "canvasing" is of not taking into account the multiple people who protests against this usage Wikipedia as vehicle for propaganda. WP:SOAP says:
 * "Wikipedia is not a soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle for propaganda, advertising and showcasing.
 * putting ghetto Warsaw uprising as it is right now without context in the intifada page is un encyclopedic propaganda driving vehicle for holocaust inversion
 * "Now, the world’s most infamous death camp has become a “metaphor” for a place where, as it just so happens, the population grows by almost three percent per year. Such is the abyss of ignorance, bigotry, and casual mendacity inhabited by Columbia’s chaired professor of Iranian studies and comparative literature"
 * https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/martinkramer/files/gaza_auschwitz_mosaic.pdf
 * here is example from vice article interview that explains the pushing the change of the word meaning and stripping it of the historical context of the word by cultural appropriate events that have not called intifadas as intifadas.
 * "Intifada, then, became unmoored in Western-media lexicon from its sense as "uprising" and instead occupied that peculiar anti-Muslim tendency to imbue Arabic words with a valence of terror. And while Hamas's terrorist tactics must be condemned, I urge that we think of intifadaas an uprising — a rising-up of an oppressed people. It is, as Khalidi told me, '''"like what the Irish did, and the Indians, and the South Africans did against apartheid."
 * https://www.vice.com/en/article/kz5y9a/why-talk-of-intifada-we-should-call-it-a-palestinian-uprising 79.176.174.2 (talk) 11:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * https://www.vice.com/en/article/kz5y9a/why-talk-of-intifada-we-should-call-it-a-palestinian-uprising 79.176.174.2 (talk) 11:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

 Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."