User talk:79.180.150.251

December 2017
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Liv Tyler. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Dr.  K.  09:46, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Dr.K - why you're keep removing the link to lovelylivtyler.com? This is not a 'spam link' nor ads/promo page earning money, this is just THE place for any Liv Tyler fan. The site is active since 2000 (that;s more than 17 years) The site a made by fans, and is not official, but was refereed several times by Liv Tyler herself as 'authorized'. and if you want to give this wiki page visitors a complete information, a link to this site is a must-have (much more than the other weird links in this wiki page, that's for sure)


 * I only removed it once. But we don't use fansites on Wikipedia. See WP:ELNO or WP:FANSITE:  Dr.   K.  16:13, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

I understand wiki doesn't allow fansites, but this website was here for years, as far as I can tell. and besides -

- as I say, we're authorized. I really think the page is incomplete without a link to lovelylivtyler.com Can you tell me what can I do to keep this link?
 * Authority in this context means journalistic or academic authority, someone with recognised knowledge on the subject of the article, not someone authorised by Liv Tyler. If the link remained in the article through some oversight, that doesn't mean that the link qualifies to remain forever once discovered. To make things even worse the link name is also promotional, since it refers to Liv Tyler as "lovely". This is strike two against the link. I don't see any way this link can remain in the article. Dr.   K.  04:58, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

And you decided that Liv Tyler is't 'someone with recognised knowledge on the subject' of Liv Tyler? or maybe llt.com isn't ?? did you read what you just write? I don't get the promotional thing either, seeing sites as 'boxofficemojo' and 'people' there, I find it ridicules. As for now - this page is flawed and is giving incomplete information.
 * And you decided that Liv Tyler is't 'someone with recognised knowledge on the subject' of Liv Tyler? Don't put words in my mouth. I said that your website is not a recognised authority on Liv Tyler and you cannot become an authority about her just because she recognised you as fans. Now you started edit-warring despite the advice I gave you and you just got reverted by another editor. That means that the advice I gave you was solid. It also means that if you persist reverting, you may be prevented from reverting further. Dr.   K.  14:41, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Liv Tyler. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If that's what you understood, I suggest you read what I wrote AGAIN.

No it doesn't. cause you both are clueless about the subject. Now you see, when someone writes an article about Indian literature - without knowing NOTHING about Indian literature - what will you get? will it be acceptable on WIKI? Obviously you know nothing about the subject of this page.

this is just useless.