User talk:79.31.103.194

May 2024
Hello, I'm Wikipedialuva. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Social Darwinism have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Wikipedialuva (talk) 12:04, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Social Darwinism. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Generalrelative (talk) 23:22, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

I created a thread to discuss this at Talk:Social Darwinism. Generalrelative (talk) 23:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Social Darwinism. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.   [[User:CanonNi ]]  (talk • contribs) 05:02, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Generalrelative (talk) 05:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as done at Social Darwinism. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Aoidh (talk) 11:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2024
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Social Darwinism, you may be blocked from editing. Egsan Bacon (talk) 21:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Social Darwinism.   [[User:CanonNi ]]  (talk • contribs) 08:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. -- ferret (talk) 14:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.