User talk:79.46.96.252

September 2018
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cyclops, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 15:10, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

These are deleted and reinserted contents without respecting the talk page--79.46.96.252 (talk) 15:12, 10 September 2018 (UTC)


 * To what discussion are you referring to ? -  FlightTime  ( open channel ) 15:20, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * "Cyclops mythology of the Caucasus region"--79.46.96.252 (talk) 15:29, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Well I'll leave it as is for others' more experienced with the subject. I just saw mass removal without a stated reason. -  FlightTime  ( open channel ) 15:35, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Cyclops, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. — Dimsar01 Talk ⌚→ 16:08, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 16:10, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Cyclops. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  17:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The content you removed cited several sources, including one published by the International Research Journal of Interdisciplinary & Multidisciplinary Studies. You need to explain why the claims in the article are inappropriate, instead of repeatedly removing them. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  17:09, 10 September 2018 (UTC)