User talk:79.51.98.25

March 2022
Hello, I'm Ctrlwiki. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Reni Eddo-Lodge have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. —Ctrlwiki (talk) 12:25, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Reni Eddo-Lodge. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —Ctrlwiki (talk) 12:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Reni Eddo-Lodge, you may be blocked from editing. Quid Est Squid (talk) 14:37, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Reni Eddo-Lodge. Quid Est Squid (talk) 15:01, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism, as done at Reni_Eddo-Lodge. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 20:19, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Edward Dutton (author), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DoebLoggs (talk) 11:39, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 11:47, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Slatersteven (talk) 10:39, 4 April 2022 (UTC)