User talk:79.54.16.70

Warning
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:25, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

I put a POV on a page the editor changed with his biased view. If all sum it uop he has power and others don't I'm not surprised your shitty encyclopedia doesn't get more donations


 * "Your shitty encyclopedia?" does that sound like someone who's WP:HERE? - LouisAragon (talk) 18:50, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

"Says the ones who treat Wikipedia as a battlegroud. Seem like "WP:BADFAITH" to me. i approached the whole thing as better as I could, I was scorned by scoundrel with no life think being wiki editors make them important

January 2021
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Drmies (talk) 21:43, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * That's what I'm talking about. Other people can personal attack me, I can't say mine opinion. That's how bullies act — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.54.16.70 (talk • contribs)
 * Yours, my, and other's opinions should be irrelevant on Wikipedia. I doubt that the editors who reverted and warned you really care who won or lost the Battle of Fornovo. The thing that should matter is what wp:reliable sources state. If you can find RS that makes those statements, they would be welcome. Just make an wp:edit request on talk:Battle of Fornovo. Adakiko (talk) 22:41, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

My opinion not on the battle but on the person who insulted me FIRST. on the battle i provided sources deleted without any explanation and when I made an POV it was taken as well. I don't want to make an account juts because a poor sob abuse his powers