User talk:79.65.67.168

I can’t. That’s because the previous time I did it, they wouldn’t let me request an account because my IP address had already been blocked. 79.65.67.168 (talk) 09:20, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * It's not because this IP was blocked, it is because this IP is under a checkuser block, meaning that there is technical evidence of a problem such as someone abusing multiple accounts. We don't know who is sitting at your computer/holding the phone making edits.  You may make another unblock request and go into more detail about your situation, addressing why technical evidence(which even admins cannot see, only checkusers) might indicate a problem with this IP range. 331dot (talk) 10:05, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

As you can see, everybody thinks I’m vandalising Wikipedia when I’m not. NinjaRobotPirate keeps range blocking my IP addresses because he thinks I’m a sockpuppet of PoliceOfficer124. I’m not a sockpuppet of anybody, all I was trying to do was investigate sockpuppets of PoliceOfficer124, who hadn’t even edited Wikipedia because he didn’t know what to do. I told NinjaRobotPirate I had found other sockpuppets of the user, but he blocked me for it. I don't know why in the world he would suspect me of a crime I didn't commit. That's all the evidence I've got. 79.65.67.168 (talk) 10:34, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * No one has said you have committed a crime, as Wikipedia is not a government. You are free to make another unblock request with that explanation, but even if I wanted to I cannot lift a checkuser block. Only a checkuser can. 331dot (talk) 10:56, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Okay, but I’m saying that you’ve got your CheckUser NinjaRobotPirate around here, turning all the Wikipedians into some sort of editor guinea pigs! If you had a manifestly incompetent Wikipedian like him, they would need to be blocked and that’s targeted at him! If he decides to block users who didn’t bloody commit a bloody crime because Wikipedia bloody well isn’t a bloody government and he wouldn’t bloody accept unblocking them just bloody because they ain’t committed a crime, then a bloody bureaucrat should remove his bloody CheckUser rights if he’s that much of a traitor! Like I told you earlier, I know you’ve bloody got you’re NinjaRobotPirate coming to turn Wikipedians into bloody editors who have been bloody brainwashed by him, just when they’re bloody trying to do their job by investigating and finding bloody sockpuppetry! If I had been a CheckUser, I bloody wouldn’t do what bloody NinjaRobotPirate does during his time bloody transforming Wikipedia into a bloody trash can! I know his edits are bloody constructive but now he’s bloody well turning Wikipedia into a bloody helicopter crash scene. All this crap targets Materialscientist, who’s bloody impersonating a scientist and hiding the bloody fact that he’s a bloody white American who’s bloody telling people he’s a bloody scientist when he bloody well isn’t! I know his edits are bloody constructive but he keeps bloody telling everybody not to add bloody controversial references when they’re not bloody controversial! I bet he’ll get blocked if he bloody continues and his bloody admin and CheckUser rights should get bloody removed. 79.65.67.168 (talk) 13:41, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Materialscientist CheckUser rights
You know Materialscientist, has he got CheckUser permission or rights? I checked the block log of PoliceOfficer124 and the reason for the block Materialscientist inserted the template CheckUserblock account. I don’t know if he has the permission or rights or is a candidate for CheckUser. Thank you. 79.65.67.168 (talk) 19:03, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * has checkuser permission. You can verify this yourself here. --Yamla (talk) 19:09, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Okay, I just needed to know. Sorry. I checked the verification log. 79.65.67.168 (talk) 19:10, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

You have talk page access solely so you can contest your block. We aren't interested in you doing anything else. --Yamla (talk) 19:39, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, sir. Sorry. Have a good Christmas. 🎄 79.65.67.168 (talk) 23:02, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Leave me alone please. I don’t need you coming down too hard, brother. 79.65.67.168 (talk) 23:03, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.