User talk:79.70.179.144

Nicholas Wade
Take it to the talk page, this has been discussed there!--Milowent • hasspoken 19:58, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

A belated welcome!


Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, 79.70.179.144! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:


 * Introductory tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Writing an article
 * Five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Community portal
 * Help pages
 * The Teahouse (newcomer help)
 * Main help desk

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Do you know about the advantages of getting a free account?

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a minimum number of days and made a minimum number of edits. If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (79.70.179.144) is used to identify you instead.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes ( ~ ) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! 205.154.245.36 (talk) 22:49, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

 RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 23:23, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 23:23, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Allergens
FYI, allergens are not a type of infection. Two totally different things. An allergen stimulates an immune response without infecting or replicating. — Shibboleth ink  (♔ ♕) 15:03, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
 * You are correct. I think we need a separate page on Bio-incidents which would cover allergic and toxic incidents. Would you like to go ahead and create one? 79.70.179.144 (talk) 21:32, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I do not believe that would be a notable article as separate from the current article. Allergen contaminations in and of themselves, if they are notable, would likely be DUE for the article which already exists. I do not believe allergen contamination or unsubstantiated "suspected" incidents are particularly due for inclusion in any article, given that these incidents happen every day, all the time, without any negative repercussions whatsoever. It would be like reporting every incident of a computer virus getting into a company. It becomes a laundry list. — Shibboleth ink  (♔ ♕) 15:36, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Nicholas Wade. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Generalrelative (talk) 00:23, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Since when does warring apply to inserting tags when other editors are in disagreement? 79.70.173.174 (talk) 00:24, 19 September 2021 (UTC)