User talk:79.97.54.72

July 2010
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule&#32;at Republic of China. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. - Vianello (Talk) 17:30, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Republic of China. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 22:49, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.  E lockid  ( Talk ) 22:57, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You are fresh off your block and the first thing you do before anything else is to continue where you left off? Not smart. Not smart at all. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 23:12, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

{unblock|I take your point onboard,and not going to argue.however I feel my points were fair and logical, and the nature of my ban is unjustified,this one anyway. I know why, and athough i already stated I understand your point,more imput would have been nice. ah wel, I know the answer to my appeal. I look forward to seeing laurents block though, as i was insulted and he was the one who actually did something wrong. cheers }}


 * Blocking admin comment: Even if they were fair and logical, that does not allow you to resume edit warring. You have been reverted by three different editors, all of which are long standing and established editors. Please see WP:Consensus as you seem to be going against it.  E lockid  ( Talk ) 23:23, 27 July 2010 (UTC)