User talk:79616gr/Archive 1

Talkback
The Dissident Aggressor 21:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Actavis/Allergan
I am reaching out because you have recently edited the Actavis, Allergan or a similar company’s page, and would like your help. Actavis made the announcement this morning that they are transitioning to the Allergan name effective today.

See the press release here http://www.allergan.com/news/news/thomson-reuters/actavis-plc-is-now-allergan-plc.

We would like to redirect the current Actavis page to the Allergan page, and merge the content found on both.

We’d appreciate your help in vetting the edits we submit and ensuring that our changes meet Wikipedia community guidelines and standards. We plan to start the migration today.

Appreciate your help. LANEYC (talk) 13:03, 15 June 2015 (UTC)LaneyC

Phoenix Global Deleted
I wish someone had contacted me regarding that delete. That issue is very big and going to get bigger, and likely we'll have to do a rewrite. I hope someone archived or kept it. The scams involved are estimated at $200M according to a further report in past month and part of international organized crime network which implicates Queensland police. http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2015/s4243032.htm I've been busy and had no time to check, and would have liked to have input. I also think the input of editors unfamiliar with, and with patronizing view of Australian issues, and the notability to Australian Wiki users, was unfair. Have I missed something or is there a way to receive updates to the watchlist via email? XRii (talk) 10:32, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Did you read the deletion discussion? It was pretty straight forward, and as the company has zero notability aside from the investigation, I can see why it was deleted. If you want to have an input, you need to log on, we're all busy! In regards to notifications, I am not sure. Sounds like a good question for the Teahouse. 79616gr (talk) 17:40, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Gloving

 * Maybe you didn't notice, but Scottywong retired, so I doubt you'll get a response about this.  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 04:53, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I am surprised it was retrieved, especially after being deleted for a second time and protected as such, but I am open to see what Graeme Bartlett augments the article with to move it from an obvious advertorial to an encyclopedic article. 79616gr (talk) 05:49, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I have restored this only as a draft, draft:Gloving, as a restore was requested at WP:REFUND. We will see if it is improved with quality references and material. The deletion argument was opposed, and there was an effort to improve it, so there is a chance it be improved to be acceptable. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:03, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for the information. I'd be very surprised if the article ended up as anything other than it was previously, but hopefully I am wrong. 79616gr (talk) 22:17, 5 July 2015 (UTC)