User talk:79616gr/Archive 2

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

New article that relies on RS media articles
Hi, 79616gr. Have seen your asssistance with oversight on WP article also originally created by Guy (Univ Med). Also created by Guy, Judith_Wilyman_PhD_controversy article also relys on a flurry of newspaper/media WP:RS to address the topic of the "PhD_controversy". But recently it's seen by some anti-vaxxers to be a place to regurgitate slabs out of the questionable PhD thesis, rather than address the fact that Wilyman and Martin used questionable UoW priviledges to publish a medical thesis in the social-science school where it would not have health academic oversight. This is the "contraversy" (as was titled by Guy) to publish a conspiracy theory PhD on the sly. Your assistance with this article appreciated. Gongwool (talk) 22:09, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I had a look, it seems the block has ended the edit war that was going on. The page is on my Watchlist so I will keep an eye on it. 79616gr (talk) 04:05, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

thanks for your support

 * You are removing RS info and essentially blanking the page. Please add to it rather than erasing it when you edit. You should also familiarize yourself with the BLP guidelines I posted on your talk page. 79616gr (talk) 23:14, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

IP Edit Warriors
The IP edit warriors/vandals at Niall Mellon do not seem to be slowing down. I highly suggest reporting them as sock puppets or vandals, otherwise, its going to just be one long edit war. -Xcuref1endx (talk) 13:02, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I sent it up to ANI here and hopefully will get some extra eyes on article. 79616gr (talk) 16:10, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Rajneesh
Hello, I see that you've edited the article on Rajneesh. I would like to ask you to give your thought on the page move discussion. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Rajneesh#Requested_move_11_June_2018 Accesscrawl (talk) 07:15, 15 June 2018 (UTC)