User talk:7 qz/Archive2019/April 1

A WikiYanny for you!

 * Thank you so much! A Dolphin (squeek?) 13:53, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

edit warring
why are you edit warring by reverting sourced material without any explanations? I'm starting to question your good faith.217.92.132.253 (talk) 18:17, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * You are introducing material contradicting what the sources say. A Dolphin (squeek?) 18:18, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * What edit has 7 qz reverted that contradicts what the sources say?217.92.132.253 (talk) 18:19, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Most of them. Not good at explaining, I'm in class ATM. A Dolphin (squeek?) 18:22, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Lol don't pretend like you have actually checked the sources I used.217.92.132.253 (talk) 18:23, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Please leave, I don't want to deal with this. A Dolphin (squeek?) 18:24, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If you don't want to deal with this then maybe don't go on a mass reverting spree without any good reason? 217.92.132.253 (talk) 18:27, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Get lost. A Dolphin (squeek?) 18:31, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is 217.92.132.253 POV/edit-warring. Jayjg (talk) 19:02, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Final warning
OK 7 qz, listen up because this is the last time I will be warning you, the next time I am just going straight to incidents for administrator attention and I am certain they will deal with you swiftly. I know you think that because I am an IP user I dont know my way around wikipedia or that I can be bullied or harassed, this assumption is false and you will be punished for it if you continue on this crusade.

You have been editing since December 2018, I have been editing wikipedia since the summer of 2016. I know more about wikipedia and am more than qualified to deal with nonsense like yours.

You have been spitefully reverting all my edits without even providing an edit summary. This is a violation of WP:HOUNDING. To quote the policy - "Hounding on Wikipedia (or "wikihounding") is the singling out of one or more editors....to repeatedly confront or inhibit their work. This is with an apparent aim of creating irritation, annoyance or distress to the other editor. Hounding usually involves following the target from place to place on Wikipedia....If "following another user around" is accompanied by tendentiousness, personal attacks, or other disruptive behavior, it may become a very serious matter and could result in blocks and other editing restrictions."

Not only that but you have edit warred and violated WP:BRD on the article The Gulag Archipelago in your futile crusade against me.

If you do not revert your hounding reverts and cease your disruption I will see you at the ANI.217.92.132.253 (talk) 13:32, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * 217.*, since both you and 7 qz are already at ANI, I don't think you need to "threaten" 7 qz with this. Also, you say you have been "editing wikipedia since the summer of 2016". What is/was your username? Jayjg (talk) 13:44, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I know but that is a discussion of my behavior not of 7 qz's. I have never had an account. I edit without logging in.217.92.132.253 (talk) 13:47, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * When a section is opened at WP:ANI, generally the behavior of all participants in the incident are examined. Also, you are quite free with the accusation that others are "hounding" you, but (along with reviewing WP:BRD), you should review WP:HOUND, which states: "Correct use of an editor's history includes (but is not limited to) fixing unambiguous errors or violations of Wikipedia policy, or correcting related problems on multiple articles. In fact, such practices are recommended both for Recent changes patrol and WikiProject Spam." When an editor makes a series of edits that clearly violate WP:NPOV (and in the case of your treatment of Pinkus, seriously and deceptively violate it), then the practice is highly recommended. Finally, editing as an IP for years invites reasonable suspicions that the reason is to violate WP:SCRUTINY. Even if that is not the case here, there are many benefits to creating an account, and I would strongly recommend it, per Wikipedia:Why create an account?. Jayjg (talk) 14:03, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Misinformation on page
Hello 7 qz - as a former employee of the NYS Senate, I noticed that you wrote Senator Ramos was instrumental in the passage of the Jose Peralta DREAM Act. However, the source you used to support that assertion merely provides a quote from her about the bill. She did not write any part of the bill and she did not take part in any negotiations regarding the substance of the bill. In addition, it was passed within the first few weeks of her beginning her term at the Senate, thus she would not have had time to work intimately with the legislation. Therefore, stating that she was "instrumental" in its passage is misleading. I might suggest rephrasing that to say she supported and voted in favor of the bill.
 * There are sources showing she did. You might be mistaken? A Dolphin (squeek?) 17:32, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

The one source listed stated “There is a backlog of progressive legislation that the new Democratic majority can finally prioritize,” said Democratic State Senator Jessica Ramos. “We might not have jurisdiction over immigration laws themselves, but there is still a lot we can do as a state to protect our diversity.” This does not prove or support that she was "instrumental" in its passage. The bill was written and negotiated over several years prior to her term in the Senate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnnaK1320 (talk • contribs) 18:19, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
 * You are absolutely correct. I've removed the material.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:41, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh, I was mistaken. It was there before you removed it, and I thought you were trying to de-neutralize the article. I apologize for this inconvenience. A Dolphin (squeek?) 13:23, 19 April 2019 (UTC)