User talk:7 qz/Archive2019/March 1

Unspecified source/license for File:Imbreadytodie.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Imbreadytodie.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 16:45, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Imbreadytodie.jpeg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Imbreadytodie.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Many thanks!
Really appreciate the wikilove my friend! -- Zack mann  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:34, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Closure
I've replaced your recent closure at AN/I in this edit. The editor was blocked for persistent addition of unsourced material. There is no hint that any checkuser action has been taken against the editor. Please be more mindful when issuing closes to accurately summarize the actions taken. Mr rnddude (talk) 16:47, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Your deletion of an editor's userbox
In the above edit you removed an editor's rollbacker-rights userbox, saying it was misleading. I've reverted your edit because AryanTheArticleArtist does have the rollbacker right, as seen here. Shearonink (talk) 23:48, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh. For some reason, it didn't show up for me. Thanks. A Dolphin (squeek?) 12:46, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

controversial
Hi 7qz

I would like to request to enable my edit regrading the Dahabshiil article on the bases of misleading information under subject which is highlighted as controversies tishee false accusations have come after baseless done by Aljazera Arabic version and dahabshiild has put a statement on social media

"Dahabshiil Group strongly refutes the false allegations made against it by Al Jazeera Arabic television. The broadcast consisted of a number of false allegations, which have been comprehensively discredited, as well as other accusations of political involvement which appear to have been invented for geopolitical reasons. Dahabshiil is a private, global business and is not in any way affiliated with any political groupings or governments. Our only purpose is to offer good service to customers and make returns for our shareholders. Dahabshiil was not given a right of reply before Al Jazeera’s report and a simple call to us would have enabled the numerous errors in the broadcast to have been avoided. We call on Al Jazeera to retract their baseless claims and remove this information from the public domain."

For complete information on Dahabshiil Group, visit https://dahabshiil.com Follow #DahabshillGroup on Facebook and Twitter

https://www.somtribune.com/2019/03/22/al-jazeera-edits-out-defamatory-report-against-dahabshiil.
 * Hello I removed the edit because you were using alternate accounts to reinstate the edits, which is against policy per WP:SOCK. Also, you violated the WP:3RR and were blanking large paragraphs of information. Also, Wikipedia states all articles must come from a neutral point of view, so removing the allegations would be against policy. Thanks for your time. A Dolphin (squeek?) 15:21, 28 March 2019 (UTC)