User talk:80.101.191.173

May 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Bronze Age Pervert has been reverted. Your edit here to Bronze Age Pervert was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzYd50Xncdc, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhjenyxAm7E) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:01, 24 May 2021 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Fan pages
I enjoy the work you've done fleshing out Bronze Age Pervert, and it's awesome how many great sources you've found, but just as a heads up, many Wikipedia editors can be pretty sensitive / aggressive about notability and "fan pages". So even though you and I both know the page passes notability standards, and everything on it is clearly sourced from third party sources with unbiased / critical perspectives, I wouldn't want someone to think it's a fan page that sings his praises too much and use that as an argument to get it deleted or your edits reverted. You might have seen that there's already been some talk of this on the talk page, and while I don't see anything that's obviously biased on the page right now, it does come across as a bit odd that BAP's page is over three times the length of Anna Khachiyan's despite her being approximately as notable. (Debatable point, I know, but look at it from a total outsider perspective.)

So I encourage you to take a critical eye to the page as it stands: for instance, do quotes from BAPbook, examples of frogsp33k, and BAP's stance on irony need to be explicitly spelled out, or can they be left for the reader to read between the lines or click through to the links for further information? When even The Joe Rogan Experience doesn't have a list of episodes on its wiki page, does it come across right to have one for Caribbean Rhythms (especially since filling it out will be a pain so the table will probably be incomplete forever)? Just some food for thought.

I might do an editing pass of my own along these lines to make the formatting more in-line with the rest of Wikipedia (for instance using " instead of ' for all quotes) and help forestall the "Eye of Sauron" falling on the page, but I wouldn't want it to come across as me undermining your work, and I encourage you to do the edits yourself if you have the time. Standardorder (talk) 16:17, 28 June 2021 (UTC)