User talk:80.111.140.53

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 21:43, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Smile (2022 film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TLJ7863 (talk) 14:51, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Smile (2022 film).  Mike  Allen   15:12, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Smile (2022 film). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. AntiDionysius (talk) 10:37, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as done at Smile (2022 film). During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:05, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

October 2023
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Curse of Chucky have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:57, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Curse of Chucky was changed by 80.111.140.53 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865999 on 2023-10-13T00:57:35+00:00

March 2024
Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the Scream 2 plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 01:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Binnenstaat. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Shooter (2007 film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Binnenstaat (talk) 02:46, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Hello, I'm Cleo Cooper. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Curse of Chucky seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cleo Cooper (talk) 20:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Misery (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Lynch44 (talk) 23:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

No, they’re hardly disruptive

They're nothing but disruptive. You spend your entire time on Wikipedia adding your own personal analysis of the characters motivations and the intelligence of their decisions. None of which are ever sourced and all of which are your own personal opinions and are irrelevant to the articles. It's not a coincidence that 95% of your posts get reverted.Rcarter555 (talk) 00:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

My opinions are correct, I’ve seen all each of these movies, and every single bit that I’ve written actually happened in the movies, not all of them are opinions and I’m trying to make them sense, regardless how much you talk about my opinions, why not ask other people and see what they think about my analysis to back up your argument. Plus each can be relevant, from where I’m standing 100% of all you people practically write your own opinions on these articles, not even giving people like me a chance to see from their/my perspective.

What you fail to understand is that your opinions (even if correct) are not relevant here on Wikipedia. You are adding your subjective analysis to what should be an objective plot summary. “Character X thought Character Y was the killer” is an objective statement. “Character X foolishly thought Character Y was the killer because Character Y was obviously a foot shorter than the killer” is a subjective statement, even if you believe it to be accurate. Rcarter555 (talk) 14:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)


 * This IP (and the many more they have used before it) is simply WP:NOTHERE.  Mike  Allen   22:31, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Why does it matter? What you fail to understand that the revelent stuff I kept are still there, A those are in fact real words, B my opinions matter just as much as everyone even you, and C Character X in Chucky movies were actually foolish ones who jumped to conclusions rather than talk, I've seen it first hand dozens of times, you people clearly like writing your own perspection, seeing the opposite of capitulation when no matter how many people tried to reason with you. Even if I did have an account you wouldn't listen, because I already tried that 80.111.140.53 (talk) 20:11, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 * It will always be reverted.  Mike  Allen   01:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
 * No “opinions” matter on Wikipedia. Only facts that can be sourced. For plot summaries, it should be concise and free from injecting subjective opinion. Rcarter555 (talk) 05:03, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
 * What if my opinions are facts? My opinions don’t matter, maybe my facts do instead. I’ve seen other subjective on this Wikipedia. Your not even being fair and still fail to speculate capitulation. People and I can just keep reverting, and I won’t quit, all I have to do is be patient.

03:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

If your opinions are facts, then they can be backed up by sources, which is the standard on Wikipedia. However, what you mostly do is insert your own opinion about the decisions characters make in films. You can be patient all you want. Eventually, you’ll be blocked and you’ll create a new account or IP and eventually that will get blocked as well. If you enjoy spending your time in that circular waste of time, that’s on you. Wikipedia editors will always come out on top in the end. Rcarter555 (talk) 16:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Good luck with that, I got no account and seems like it already happened with my IP and nothing changes, eventually you people will give up. And for the record I’m not the only one wasting time considering that you keep up with my changes and can’t just accept it, that part is on you too. You talk big but in the end I’m always step head of you and your just another human just as much as I am. 11:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi 80.111.140.53! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. JeffSpaceman (talk) 22:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at It's a Wonderful Knife. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 22:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Welcome!
Hello, and thank you for lending your time to help improve Wikipedia! If you are interested in continuing to edit, I suggest you make an account to gain a bunch of privileges. Happy editing! C F A  💬  20:42, 23 June 2024 (UTC)